Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Lott

California Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1909No. L.A. No. 2418PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon sustaining a demurrer to the amended complaint, without leave to amend. The action was one by the vendee for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of certain real estate in the city of Los Angeles.

The complaint shows the following facts:—

Plaintiff was engaged in the real estate business in his own name and also in the business name of “Robert Marsh & Co.” On February 25, 1905, defendant executed and delivered to him an option for the purchase of the land, the same being as follows:—

“For and in consideration of the sum of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Bell v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Brundy v. CanbyMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Feldesman v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Wright v. BrooksMontana Supreme Court · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API