Feldesman v. McGovern
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
This is an action by a client against his attorneys for damages, based on allegations to the effect that they negligently failed to perform one of the duties for which they were employed, namely, to file a petition for his discharge in bankruptcy. The respondent is one of the two attorneys sued. He appeared separately and his demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Accordingly judgment was entered in his favor, and the client appeals. The record on which the appeal was taken does not disclose whether respondent’s co-defendant was served with summons, or…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Ishmael v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Niosi v. AielloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.