Bell v. Hudson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
— According to the complaint, the material facts are as follows: In 1849 John A. Bell and William M. Bell became partners " in the business of buying and selling stock, and the purchase of real and personal property.” The business was carried on until the death of John A. Bell in 1859, at which time there was on hand, belonging to the firm, “ a large amount of personal *286property, consisting of stock cattle, beef cattle, horses, and mares, of the estimated value, as plaintiff is informed and believes to be true, of fifty thousand dollars; real estate situated in the county of Sutter…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Sullivan v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Godden v. KimmellSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Brown v. County of Buena VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- McKnight v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Robertson v. BurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Riley v. BlackerMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Mullan's Adm'r v. CarperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
- Perez v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.