Federal Construction Co. v. Wolfson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Hugo D. Newhouse, Bussell P. Tyler and Charles W. Cobb for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
Plaintiff seeks to recover upon a street assessment levied by the board of public works of the city and county of San Francisco for the improvement of Fifteenth Avenue, between Fulton and Balboa Streets. Plaintiff recovered judgment and defendants appeal. The proceedings for the improvement of said street were had under the provisions of a street improvement ordinance enacted under the power conferred by section 33 of chapter 2, article VI, of the charter of San Francisco (Stats. 1911, p. 1691; Stats. 1913, pp. 1482, 1483, 1623), which ordinance is referred to in the case of Bienfield v. Van…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Carlson v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- Meyer v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- In re Difference & Controversy between E. M. Derby & Co. & City of ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Skinner v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Flynn v. ChiappariCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Federal Construction Co. v. NewhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Mann v. City of ArtesiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- City of Hialeah v. United States ex rel. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Commercial Finance Corp. v. GaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.