Federal Construction Co. v. Newhouse
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Hugo D. Newhouse, Russell P. Tyler and Charles W. Cobb Eor Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
Defendants appeal from judgments rendered against them foreclosing the lien of street assessments for the improvement of Nineteenth Avenue, in San Francisco, with all street crossings but one, between Quintara and Vicente Streets, by paving, curbing, and sewering; the latter for one block only. The appeals from the two judgments are to be considered together, and only differ for the reason that they are for assessments upon different properties and against different persons. The same points are raised as in Federal Construction Co. v. Wolfson, ante, p. 267, [199 Pac. 512], and have been…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Oakland Paving Co. v. Whittell Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- McLaughlin v. KnoblochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Hadley v. DagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Flynn v. ChiappariCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Flinn v. Shafter Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Tibbits Pacific Co. v. FirthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- City Construction Co. v. KennyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- City Street Improvement Co. v. QuigleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.