Legal Opinion

Meyer v. City of Muscatine

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1864PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

68 U.S. 384 (1863)

1 Wall. 384

MEYER

v.

THE CITY OF MUSCATINE.

Supreme Court of United States.

The case was submitted on briefs of Mr. Cook for the bondholders, and of Mr. Richman and Butler for the city of Muscatine.

2Opinion of the Court · SwayneJustice Swayne

The demurrer brings under examination the objections taken by the defendant to the validity of the coupons upon which this suit is founded.

These objections will be considered as we proceed.

I. "That there is no authority in the charter of the city of Muscatine under which money may be borrowed to aid in the construction of railroads."

The charter gives the city authority "to borrow money…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BabbitSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. Mowry v. BishopNew York Court of Chancery · 1835

4Cited by44 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Marion County v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. HamSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Lewis v. Commissioners of Bourbon Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. National Life Ins. Co. of Montpelier v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  5. United States Mortgage Co. v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API