State Ex Rel. Dewberry v. Kulongoski
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Relators appeal from a judgment dismissing their petition for an alternative writ of mandamus. They argue that the trial court erred in concluding that they failed to establish that they do not have a “plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law,” ORS 34.110, and that the trial court misapplied ORCP 29 and ORS 28.110 in the present proceeding. As explained below, we agree with relators in certain respects, albeit at some points for reasons not advanced by the parties, and conclude that relators did not have a “plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Palmer v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Venture Properties, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- STATE EX REL. DEWBERRY v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Delgado v. Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Klamath Irrigation District v. Water Resources Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.