NORTHWEST STEELHEADERS ASS'N v. Simantel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Defendants 1 and intervenor appeal from a judgment that (1) declares that title to certain lands lying below the ordinary high water mark of the John Day River is held by the State of Oregon; and (2) rejects defendants’ counterclaims for trespass. Defendants assign error to the denial of their motions to dismiss and for directed verdicts and to the trial court’s determination that the segments of the river at issue are navigable under federal law for purposes of establishing title. Intervenor assigns error, inter alia, to the trial court’s declaration of navigability. On the merits of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Arizona Navigable Stream Adjudication CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Hardy v. State Land BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Kramer v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State of Montana v. Talen Montana, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Dow v. Az NsacCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.