Kitras v. Town of Aquinnah
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Before us are the owners of certain landlocked lots lying within the town of Aquinnah (town) on Martha’s Vineyard. Desirous of developing their lots but having no road frontage or access to utilities, these owners claim easements by necessity crossing their neighbors’ lots. One of those neighbors is the United States, which holds a number of town lots in trust for the Wampanoag Tribal Council of Gay Head, Inc. (Tribe), a Federally recognized Native American Tribe. On cross motions for dismissal or summary judgment, a Land Court judge concluded that any easements by necessity would burden…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Frank B. James v. James G. WattCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- M.P.M. Builders, LLC v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Gayetty v. BethuneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- Orpin v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Dale v. BedalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kitras v. Town of AquinnahMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Smaland Beach Association, Inc. v. GenovaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay HeadDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Frostar Corp. v. MalloyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Kitras v. Zoning AdministratorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.