Legal Opinion

Paules v. Elbert, Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1955No. Civ. No. 21214PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem.*

By his complaint in this action appellant sought to quiet his title to certain real property in the city of Hermosa Beach against the claims of defendant Elbert, Ltd.

By the judgment appealed from the trial court decreed that defendant is the owner of and entitled to possession of the real property in question and that plaintiff has no right, title or interest therein.

The facts are not in dispute. They are:

Defendant acquired a street improvement bond issued under the Improvement Act of 1911 under date of August 25, 1925. This bond was a lien on the subject property.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Scheas v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Estate of KeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Jeffreys v. Point Richmond Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stoney Creek Orchards v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API