Legal Opinion

Christerson v. French

California Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1919No. L. A. No. 4782PublishedCited by 59 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Frank C. Hoyt, Henry Wetherhorn and Charles J. Kelly for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order setting aside a judgment entered by default against L. B. French. The plaintiff agreed to purchase and L. B. French agreed to sell a certain tract of land in Los Angeles County. French covenanted to pipe water to the said land for domestic and irrigating purposes. This, it was alleged, he failed to do, and upon the breach of the covenant this action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages in the sum of five thousand eight hundred dollars, together with costs.

On July 17, 1915, L. B, French (who died on May 17, 1916) was personally served…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. King Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. In re Estate of JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Brush v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Estate of KeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Falahati v. KondoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Baird v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lynch v. BenciniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Brooks v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API