Cohen v. Cohen
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Henry H. Davis, W. R. Daingerfield, and Jerome H. Kann, for Appellant. H. M. Owens, T. C. West, L. C. Pistolesi, George Knight White, and Henry G. Tardy, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Pauline Cohen, on January 4, 1898, obtained a decree of divorce from the defendant, Meyer Cohen, judgment being taken by default for his failure to appear or answer. The decree adjudged that Meyer Cohen should pay to Pauline, as permanent alimony, the sum of ten dollars per month thereafter. On October 4, 1898, Pauline was married to one Hoffman. On December 4, 1901, Pauline duly assigned to George Knight White all money due her under the decree. On December 13, 1901, White obtained an order in the case requiring the defendant to show cause before said superior court on December 20, 1901, why…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Ex parte SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Stillman v. StillmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Gaston v. GastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Southworth v. TreadwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.