Legal Opinion
Stoney Creek Orchards v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1970No. Civ. 12267PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint in inverse condemnation after the state’s general demurrer was sustained without leave to amend.
The complaint alléges that the bank of the Sacramento River on plaintiffs’ lands has been and will continue to be eroded “by the operation of the Central Valley Project” and “by the change in the natural stream flow caused by the plan, design, construction, and operation of Shasta, Keswick, and Black Butte Dams 1 and the use of the Sacramento River as a canal for the transportation of water for the Central Valley Project.”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Gilmer v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weiner v. Mitchell, Silberberg & KnuppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Arreola v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Souza v. Silver Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Del Oro Hills v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Gomez v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.