Legal Opinion

Jeffreys v. Point Richmond Canal & Land Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 11426PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

Plaintiff sued as the purchaser for value of over two hundred street bonds issued by the city of Richmond in the year 1917 under the Street Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730). Judgment went for the plaintiff for the amount prayed and also for the foreclosure of separate liens upon the lots involved. The defendant Mintzer Estate Company was the owner of a mortgage upon the property upon which the bonds were a prior lien, and said company is the only defendant who has appealed from the judgment.

The facts are undisputed. The appellant is the holder of two promissory notes from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Teralta Land & Water Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Welsh v. CrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Houston v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Loew's Inc. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. County of San Diego v. ChildsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Bradley Co. v. RidgewayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API