Legal Opinion · Dissent

McAfee v. Cole

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 18, 1994Published

1DissentDana, Justice

In the absence of explicit legislative direction, determining when a cause of action accrues remains a judicial function. Anderson v. Neal, 428 A.2d 1189, 1190-91 (Me.1981). A cause of action generally accrues when the wrongful act occurs. In certain limited circumstances, however, we have held that a cause of action accrues not when the wrongful act occurs, but when the plaintiff discovers the harm. Our determination of what circumstances merit the application of the “discovery rule” has depended on four factors: (1) the nature of the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant; (2)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Anderson v. NealSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Chiapetta v. Clark AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  4. Bozzuto v. OuelletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. Kasu Corp. v. Blake, Hall & Sprague, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API