Legal Opinion

Bozzuto v. Ouellette

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 5, 1979PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

The Superior Court held that this conversion action against a deputy sheriff who wrongfully sold property attached in a prior suit was barred by the statute of limitations. That holding was correct as a matter of law. We accordingly deny plaintiff’s appeal from the summary judgment dismissing the action.

In August, 1968, Mr. Bozzuto, the present plaintiff, was sued for alienation of affections by one Diehl. Mr. Bozzuto was acting at the time as the club professional at the Poland Spring Country Club. In connection with commencing the action of Diehl v. Bozzuto, Mr.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  2. Betts v. NorrisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1842
  3. Brown v. HaynesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
  4. Ross v. PhilbrickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1854

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. McAfee v. ColeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Anderson v. NealSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Choroszy v. TsoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Chiapetta v. Clark AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API