Legal Opinion
State v. Cue
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 31, 2014No. 13CV03100; A155531PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.
Plaintiff, the State of Oregon by and through the Oregon Health Authority (OHA), brought a claim against the estate of Deane Preston Cloud to recover $666,187.40 for care and services rendered to Cloud by the Oregon State Hospital before his death. Defendant, the personal representative of Cloud’s estate, disallowed OHA’s claim as untimely. See ORS 115.005(2) (setting forth time limitations for presenting claims against the estate of a decedent). OHA initiated this action against defendant, arguing that its claim qualified for an exception to the time limitation under ORS 115.005(3).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Oregon Health Authority v. CueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017