Legal Opinion
Farrington v. Mikeska
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 7, 1946No. Patent Appeals 5112, 5113PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATFIELD, Associate Judge.
These are cross-appeals in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of the subject matter defined by count 1 to appellees Farrington et al. in appeal No. 5113, and that of count 2 to appellee Mikeska in appeal No. 5112.
The interference is between application No. 374,078 of Farrington et al. filed January 11, 1941, which is a division of a parent application No. 241,648, filed November 21, 1938, and Mikeska’s patent No. 2,219,050, issued October 22, 1940, on an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Garand v. PedersenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Schweyer v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- Thompson v. DickeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- Hogue v. CowlingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
3Cited by16 opinions
- Monsanto Company v. Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. And Agrigenetics, Inc., Defendants-Cross and Syngenta Seeds, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Searle v. GlarumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. Monsanto Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Arthur William Anderson and William Lawrence Truett v. Gustav Pieper, Hans Rickert and Eberhard SteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Young v. BullittCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.