Alameda MacAdamizing Co. v. Pringle
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new-trial. John Ellsworth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This action was brought to foreclose a street assessment lien under an assessment issued by the superintendent of streets of the city of Oakland. Defendants recovered judgment, and this appeal is by plaintiff from the judgment and order denying a new trial. It appears that the contract was let under the street law, and an ordinance duly adopted by the city, which provided, among other things, that all persons bidding for street work shall “file a bond in the sum to be determined by the mayor guaranteeing the work for one year from injury by ordinary use.” Was this specification…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parsons v. SmilieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Brown v. JenksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Portland v. Bituminous Paving Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blochman v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Shake v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Woollacott v. MeekinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Young v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Dillingham v. City CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.