Woollacott v. Meekin
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action by twelve persons owning separate lots of land in the city of Los Angeles to obtain a decree declaring void and annulling a certain assessment upon their land for street work done on Mott Street in said city and the bonds issued thereon constituting a lien on said land. Judgment was given in favor of plaintiffs, and defendant appeals therefrom.
Upon 'the question as to the validity of the assessment and bonds it will be necessary to notice but one of the objections of plaintiffs. The street work done consisted of the grading and graveling of a portion of Mott Street, and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Asevado v. OrrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Goldtree v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Brown v. JenksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Reynolds v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gay v. EngebretsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Stanwood v. CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Pasadena Park Improvement Co. v. LelandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Allen v. Globe Grain and Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Valley Construction Co. v. City of CalistogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.