Legal Opinion

Portland v. Bituminous Paving Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1898PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Action by the City of Portland against the Bituminous Paying & Contract Co. and others on a bond.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Action by the City of Portland against the Bituminous Paying & Contract Co. and others on a bond. The complaint, after setting forth the corporate character of the plaintiff and the defendant company, alleges, in substance, the following facts : That said paying and improvement company entered into a contract with the city, a copy of which is attached to the complaint, and marked “Exhibit A”; that on June 29 and 30, 1891, Ordinance No. 6,718, providing for the improvement of Washington street from the west line of Second street to its intersection with…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

It is important at the outset to ascertain and determine the proper interpretation to be given the language of the condition of the bond relating to repairs. The respondent contends that the condition is effective only as a guaranty that the work and materials will be done and furnished according to the stipulations of the contract, and hence that the bond stands as security for the faithful performance thereof. The language of the ordinance and the condition are very nearly identical, so that the consideration of the purpose of the former must necessarily aid us in arriving at the true…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Moore v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. State Board of Agriculture v. Citizens Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. School District No. 8 v. Twin Falls County Mutual Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Municipal Security Co. v. Baker CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People Ex Rel. North v. . FeatherstonhaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. The People v. Federal Surety Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Allen v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API