Legal Opinion

Young v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1903No. 4519PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. William 0. Chapman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

- This appeal is from a judgment of the superior court setting aside and declaring void a reassessment made by the city of Tacoma in certain reassessment proceedings for street improvements made upon a portion of Pacific avenue, in said city. The original proceedings for the improvement were begun in 1893, and provided for paving the street with bituminous rock upon a concrete foundation, and with granite curb stones on both sides of the street. Such proceedings were had that in August, 1893, a contract was entered into between the city of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Verdin v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Fehler v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  3. Portland v. Bituminous Paving Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State ex rel. Hemen v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Town of Tumwater v. PixWashington Supreme Court · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Spokane v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Collins v. City of EllensburgWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Rucker Bros. v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Alexander v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API