Legal Opinion

Irvine v. Perry

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1897No. S. F. No. 669PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County. N. A. Dorn, Judge. The facts are'stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SEARLS, C.

This appeal is taken by F. C. Martin, one of the defendants in the above-entitled cause, from a decree of foreclosure of four mortgages. The cause comes up on the judgment-roll, without any statement or bill of exceptions.

On the second day of June, 1890, the defendant, John A. Perry, being the owner of five lots or parcels of land situate in Monterey county, designated as lots Nos. 10, 11, 55, 56, and 93 of the Rancho Buena Vista, mortgaged all thereof to Samuel Irvine, the plaintiff herein, to secure the payment of a promissory note for $4,000 and interest. The mortgage was duly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. NaftzgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Clemens v. LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Alvord v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Boob v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Weyant v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Klokke v. EscaillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Evers v. CornelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Gibson v. HammangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Commonwealth Land Title Co. v. KornbluthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. County Bank v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API