Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ambe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 22, 2012No. Misc. Docket AG No. 6, September Term, 2011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*102DALE R. CATHELL (Retired, specially assigned), J.

On March 17, 2011, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (the Commission) filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action in which it asserted that Jude Ambe, Respondent, violated Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 5.5, 7.1, 8.1,1 and 8.4.2’3 The Petition included the following assertions:

1. The Respondent was admitted to practice in the State of New York on or about 2009.

2. Respondent is not now, and has never been, a member of the Bar of the Court of Appeals of Maryland.

3. During times relevant to this matter, Respondent…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. TankoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. LangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Attorney Grievance v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Attorney Grievance v. AmbeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API