Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Siskind
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 24, 2007No. Misc. Docket AG No. 22 September Term, 2006PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel, filed with this Court a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action (the “Petition”) against William L. Siskind (“Respondent”), alleging violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”) in connection with his transactions involving a business associate named Frank Zokaites. Respondent is charged with violations of MRPC 1.4 (Communication), 1 1.7 (Conflict of Interest: General Rule), 2 1.8 (Conflict of Interest: Prohibited Transactions), 3 1.9 (Conflict of Interest: Former Client), 4…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Brennan's, Inc. v. Brennan's Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.