Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Bonner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 3, 2022No. 51ag/20PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Keith M. Bonner, Miscellaneous Docket AG No. 51, September Term, 2020, Opinion by Booth, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – DISBARMENT Respondent Keith M. Bonner violated the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct (“D.C. Rules”) 8.4 (a), (b), and (c) by misappropriating funds from his law firm over a period of several years and making numerous knowing and intentional misrepresentations to principals and employees at his law firm to conceal the misconduct. Considering the nature of Mr. Bonner’s misconduct and the various mitigating and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SperyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Attorney Grievance v. TaniformCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Attorney Grievance v. SilbigerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Attorney Grievance v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Attorney Grievance v. WescottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API