Legal Opinion

Graham v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1939No. 226; 157, Misc. Docket, 7PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In order to aid the City of Philadelphia in its effort to balance the budget, which has been too long delayed, we make the following order, to be followed later by an opinion giving our views on the various questions propounded. We wish to emphasize what was said at oral argument that this court is not responsible for the wisdom of the plan or the policy to be employed in balancing the budget for the fiscal year 1939. Our sole duty is to pass on the legal questions involved, which we now do.

We hold that the City has the power to sell and assign the rentals payable under the operating contract…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hamilton's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Interstate Power Co. v. Town of McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Philadelphia Facilities Management Corp. v. BiesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API