Legal Opinion
United States v. Cortez-Arias
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 18, 2005No. 04-10184PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on April 18, 2005 and published at 403 F.3d 1111, as previously amended on July 14, 2005 at 415 F.3d 977, is AMENDED as follows.
Footnote 8 states:
Because Cortez-Arias waived all appellate rights except for the sole issue of whether his prior conviction was a “crime of violence,” he is not entitled to relief under the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and our decision in United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005).
Foot…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Martin CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Samuel Demont BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Anibal Jose Diaz-ArguetaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Vernon Lee Bad Marriage, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Rafael Pacheco-Navarette, United States of America v. Victor Alfonso Gomez-VeraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Diaz-ArguetaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.