Legal Opinion
United States v. Rafael Pacheco-Navarette, United States of America v. Victor Alfonso Gomez-Vera
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 23, 2005No. 04-10396, 04-10442PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Rafael Pacheco-Navarette (“Pacheco”) and Victor Gomez-Vera (“Gomez”) appeal their convictions and sentences following each appellant’s guilty plea to being an alien in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(5) and 924(a)(2). Principally, appellants argue that their appeal waivers are invalid. We must also consider whether to remand in light of Booker and Ameline. We dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Pacheco and Gomez pled guilty to violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(5) and 924(a)(2) because of their possession…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Michael Nguyen, AKA Viet Quoc NguyenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. ScurlarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- State v. Lloyd, 2006-L-185 (6-15-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- United States v. James JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BrideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Eduardo Amezcue v. J. Tim OchoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.