Legal Opinion
United States v. Cantrell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 12, 2006No. 03-30562, 03-30563, 03-30565, 03-30567, 03-30568, 04-30026, 04-30028PublishedCited by 425 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Newton Cantrell (“N.Cantrell”), Angela Walker (“AWalker”), Theresa Walker (“T.Walker”), Jack Coversup (“Coversup”), and Jeanine Renz (“Renz”) challenge the sentences they received as a result of their jury convictions for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and other related charges. N. Cantrell argues that his sentence is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), which rendered the federal Sentencing Guidelines advisory. A.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Fortino Saucedo VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by425 opinions
- United States v. Lydia CooperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. KristlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Zameer Nooralla Mohamed, AKA Al, AKA Samier Hussain, AKA Zameer MohamedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. DallmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Marcial-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
420 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.