Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin Cardenas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2005No. 03-10009PublishedCited by 209 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

Martin Cardenas appeals the mandatory minimum sentence he received after pleading guilty to three counts of possessing heroin with intent to distribute, and one count of possessing heroin and cocaine with intent to distribute. Although he waived the right to appeal, he contends that the government breached the plea agreement and that his sentence is illegal because he was entitled to the safety valve codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). We hold that there was no breach by the government and that the sentence was not illegal. We dismiss the appeal.

FACT AND PROCEEDINGS

During…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge VENCES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. David L. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ollie JOHNSON, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by209 opinions

  1. United States v. George R. BlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Jose Luis Gonzalez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Juan Espinoza-CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. DecoudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. BranchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API