United States v. Samuel Demont Bradley
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Samuel Bradley argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in deciding to sign a plea agreement and that, in any event, he is no longer bound by the agreement — specifically, its provisions that he would be sentenced under the United States Sentencing Guidelines and that he could not appeal the sentence — in the aftermath of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because we traditionally address ineffective-assistance claims on collateral review and because Bradley has given us no good reason for doing otherwise…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- United States v. George R. BlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. Tyronski JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Gilberto Martinez (03-3833), Jerel Henderson (03-3835), Kevin S. Harris (03-3879), Brian Garrett (03-3917)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Calvin Caver (05-3295) Tamir Abdullah (05-3297) Fred Cloud (05-3344)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.