Legal Opinion

United States v. Samuel Demont Bradley

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 10, 2005No. 03-6328PublishedCited by 164 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

Samuel Bradley argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in deciding to sign a plea agreement and that, in any event, he is no longer bound by the agreement — specifically, its provisions that he would be sentenced under the United States Sentencing Guidelines and that he could not appeal the sentence — in the aftermath of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because we traditionally address ineffective-assistance claims on collateral review and because Bradley has given us no good reason for doing otherwise…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. United States v. George R. BlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. United States v. Tyronski JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Gilberto Martinez (03-3833), Jerel Henderson (03-3835), Kevin S. Harris (03-3879), Brian Garrett (03-3917)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Calvin Caver (05-3295) Tamir Abdullah (05-3297) Fred Cloud (05-3344)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API