Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 1, 2005No. 20-15316PublishedCited by 1,391 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to apply the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). In Booker, the Supreme Court struck down the sentencing scheme created by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 to the extent that the Act mandated the imposition of sentences predicated on facts not found by the jury or admitted by the defendant. To remedy the constitutional infirmity, the Court severed the mandatory portions of the Act, rendering its sentencing provisions, including the Sentencing Guidelines, effectively…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,391 opinions

  1. People v. LockridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Lavell DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Isidro Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Micah J. GourdeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

1,386 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API