United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to apply the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). In Booker, the Supreme Court struck down the sentencing scheme created by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 to the extent that the Act mandated the imposition of sentences predicated on facts not found by the jury or admitted by the defendant. To remedy the constitutional infirmity, the Court severed the mandatory portions of the Act, rendering its sentencing provisions, including the Sentencing Guidelines, effectively…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,391 opinions
- People v. LockridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Lavell DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Isidro Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Micah J. GourdeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
1,386 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.