Jackson & Sons v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.
The plaintiff’s objections to the entertainment of the defendant’s objections to proceeding with the action in this jurisdiction, present no question of law. They concern matters relating to the rules of the superior court and their application or suspension. Cases involving an issue of jurisdiction over a party have no pertinence to this controversy. It is true that consent will confer that feature of jurisdiction. But where the issue concerns jurisdiction over the subject-matter a different rule prevails. Consent cannot confer a non-existent jurisdiction of subject-matter (Mansfield v.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Zurick v. InmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Eastern Union Co. of Delaware, Inc. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
- In re DoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.