Legal Opinion

Eastern Union Co. of Delaware, Inc. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement District

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 19, 1934No. 56PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

We are of the opinion that the motions of the defendant should be granted and the attachment dissolved. In view of the announced appellate disposition of the case, our reasons will not be unduly extended, but need only be sufficient to show the basis of our conclusion form the foundation for appellate action.

The sole question to be briefly discussed is the liability to suit of a public corporation—a municipal, or quasi-municipal corporation—in a State other than that of its creation.

The defendant, we think, is a public corporation. It is a…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Brockenbrough v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Phillips v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Wilmington Housing Authority v. Williamson Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  3. City of Wilmington v. SpencerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  4. Blake v. Town of Delaware CityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  5. Flait v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API