In re Doe
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
The plaintiff has petitioned this court to exercise original jurisdiction by issuing a writ of certiorari or a writ of prohibition directed to the Plaistow District Court. The plaintiff seeks review of orders issued ostensibly under RSA 169-C:27 (Supp. 1983), requiring him to reimburse the Town of Kingston for certain services rendered to his child, known herein as Jane Doe. We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and exercise our jurisdiction thereunder by vacating the district court’s orders in question.
An abbreviated statement of facts follows. At all relevant times the plaintiff and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Fortenbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re Russell C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- City of Claremont v. TruellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Jackson & Sons v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. New Hampshire Board of Examiners of PsychologistsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- In re DoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- In re Bill F.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- State ex rel. McLellan v. CavanaughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Petition of Kerry D.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.