Legal Opinion

Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of London

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1933PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The plaintiff is a Massachusetts corporation. The defendant is an English bank whose principal place of business is London, England, and which carries on business solely in England and Wales. The action is in contract and was begun by trustee writ. The declaration sets out in several counts two causes of action, based on an alleged right to recover large sums of money on deposit in the defendant bank. The plaintiff asserts title to these deposits made in the defendant bank by the Moscow Merchants Bank. It claims title under assignments from two nonresident alien corporations — the Moscow…

2Cases cited110 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. George Lambert, D/B/A Rainbow Fruit v. Sam Kysar and Joan Kysar, D/B/A Lewis River Tree FarmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Pain v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Kluger v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. Paro v. Longwood HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API