Legal Opinion

Tad Imuta v. Takaaki Nakano

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1991No. B058281PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

The respondents, Reverend Tad Imuta et al. (respondents), move to dismiss the appeal filed on April 25, 1991, by Richard I. Fine, Esq. (Fine), from 10 described orders of the trial court imposing monetary sanctions which were made in 1989 and 1990. To the extent that such orders were appealable when imposed, respondents’ motion is well taken as the notice of appeal was filed too late; as to those orders which were nonappealable and not reviewable except on an appeal from the final judgment in the main action, the notice of appeal, although inartfully stated, is timely. Fine…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Alford v. PiernoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. In Re Marriage of SkelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Laraway v. Pasadena Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Rao v. CampoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Calhoun v. Vallejo City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Production Supply Co. v. Fry Steel Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare ConsultantsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API