Production Supply Co. v. Fry Steel Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:
Production Supply Company, Inc. (PSC) and Production Supply Company of Washington, Inc. (PSCW) appeal the dismissal of their malicious prosecution action against Fry Steel Company (Fry) and Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft (Cadwalader). Appellants seek recovery for harm allegedly sustained as a result of Fry and Cadwalader’s commencement and maintenance of a civil action against them in California state court. Because Appellants raised a similar claim in the California action, the district court held that the malicious prosecution claim was barred by res judicata. We affirm.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Airport Comm'rs of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Norris v. Hearst TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Jones v. Sheehan, Young & Culp, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Co. v. Interenergy Resources, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Petrina Thompson v. Dallas City Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Hammervold v. BlankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.