Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
This appeal 1 from an order imposing, a monetary discovery sanction of $8,786.36 raises the issue of whether, under the California Civil Discovery Act of 2004 (Code Civ. Proc., § 2016.010 et seq.), 2 the trial court has the authority to hear a motion to compel responses to written interrogatories under section 2030.290 when the party on whom the interrogatories were served fails to serve any response within the required time, thereby waiving all objections, but after the motion is served, provides an untimely response that the propounding party deems inadequate. In the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. TrevinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Ellis v. Toshiba America Information Systems., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- St. Mary v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Williams v. RussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Clement v. AlegreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.