Legal Opinion

Gouveia v. Pulley (In Re Pulley)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided October 12, 1989No. 19-20458PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FRANCIS G. CONRAD, Bankruptcy Judge * .

On November 10, 1988, the Trustee filed a “Complaint to Compel Turnover” 1 to the debtors’ estate any interest Debtor had as a participant in an “Employee Investment Program” (EIP) with Bethlehem as of August 10, 1988, the filing date of the debtors’ Chapter 7 Petition for relief under 11 USC §§ 101, et seq. The Trustee alleges, inter alia, that any interest Debtor has in the EIP is property of the estate under 11 USC § 541, 2 subject to a two-year waiting period because Debtor may withdraw common stock or cash…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re TudorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
  2. Blixseth v. Kirschner (In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2010
  3. In Re CompUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. In Re BertolamiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1999
  5. Employee Benefits Committee v. Tabor (In Re Cress)District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API