Legal Opinion

Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 1977No. 76-15PublishedCited by 1,209 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

Franchise agreements between manufacturers and retailers frequently include provisions barring the retailers from selling franchised products from locations other than those specified in the agreements. This case presents important questions concerning the appropriate antitrust analysis of these restrictions under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1, and the Court’s decision in United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co., 388 U. S. 365 (1967).

*38I

Respondent GTE Sylvania Inc. (Sylvania) manufactures and sells television sets through its Home Entertainment Products…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,209 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

1,204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API