Legal Opinion
Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided May 8, 1961No. C.D. 2254PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DoNloN, Judge:
These two protests have been consolidated for trial. The merchandise of both protests is described as horsemeat. It was imported from Canada. There are certain differences in the merchandise of the two entries, as imported, and it is asserted that these differences are relevant to tariff classification of the merchandise.
The horsemeat of protest 59/29912 included both fresh and frozen horsemeat, but none of it had been decharacterized. All of the horse-meat of that protest was classified by the collector under paragraph 706 as meat, not specially provided for, and charged with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hertz v. WoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Merritt v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Kleinberger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. Tower & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. SwiftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Dalquest v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964