Lackawanna Steel Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 43180. [Oral argument Feb. 26 and 27, 1920, by Mr. Halstead and Mr. MuIvaney.J
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
While there is controversy herein as to the representative character of the two collective samples in evidence, it may well be assumed for the purposes of this case that those offered by the Government as official samples are representative of the importations. They consist of mixed pieces of stone concededly ranging in sizes of from one-sixteenth of an inch to 4 inches in dimensions. The importations were of carload lots by The Lackawanna Steel Co., at the port of Buffalo, and shipped by the Canadian Crushed Stone Co., which company quarried the stone at and shipped it from Dundas, Ontario, *94C…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Baumgarten v. MagoneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Protests 103339-K of Pacific National BankUnited States Customs Court · 1945
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Studner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Domestic Marble & Stone Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.