Legal Opinion

Tower v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 25, 1956No. C. D. 1787PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

By stipulation, dated October 7, 1955, prior submission of this case was vacated and the case was resubmitted to the third division of this court as it is now constituted.

Plaintiff protests liquidation of merchandise, described in the invoices as ground cereal offal feed, as a nonenumerated manufactured article, dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 52739, supplemented by T. D. 52827. It is plaintiff’s contention that this merchandise should be classified either under paragraph 730 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SalomonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. Geo. S. Bush & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Ricks v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Studner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Woolart Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API