Legal Opinion

Yager v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1984No. C8-83-1962PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Crow Wing District Court granting respondent’s motion for a temporary injunction. Appellants claim issuance of the temporary injunction was not proper because respondent had an adequate remedy at law and because the trial court abused its discretion. We reverse.

FACTS

In April 1983 appellants Lyndale and Deloris Thompson entered into a business arrangement with respondent Victor Yager regarding a bowling alley. The record is unclear as to the exact nature of this arrangement. Yager claims he hired Lyndale Thompson to manage the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Miller v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Edin v. Jostens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of Saint PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Ecolab, Inc. v. GartlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Zimmerman v. LaskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Oxford Development Minnesota, Inc. v. County of RamseyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API