Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Lasky

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 24, 1985No. C2-85-908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal of the dismissal of appellant’s complaint. Appellant claims the trial court erred by (1) finding the respondent judge judicially immune from suit, (2) finding respondent clerk of court was acting within his authority in administering the collection of appellant’s fine, and (3) denying appellant’s motion for temporary and permanent injunctive relief. We affirm.

FACTS

On January 9, 1984, appellant appeared pro se and was convicted by respondent county judge of three petty misdemeanors: (1) operating a motor vehicle without license in possession…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Hoppe v. KlapperichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Adelman v. OnischukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Peterson v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drobnak v. Andersen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Thunanber v. Uponor, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  3. Kipp v. SaetreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Alan Drobnak v. Andersen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Kipp v. SaetreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API