Legal Opinion

Nusekabel v. Cincinnati Public School Employees Credit Union, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1997No. C-970069PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Presiding Judge.

In this case, the city of Cincinnati’s failed attempt to create a subway system in the 1920s haunts a present-day real-estate tangle. Inattention by later parties has created a further mess concerning a parking lot for a building that was built before the automobile’s invention. And the trial court’s well-intentioned action has woven a further and worse tangle. We must cut the knot.

I. The History

In September 1988, Edward and Carol Nusekabel, the plaintiffs-appellees, acquired title to 1009 Marshall Avenue, on which an apartment building extends the property’s entire…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. City of Cincinnati v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 1855

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Striefel v. Charles-Keyt-Leaman PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Houck v. Board of Park CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Fitzpatrick v. PalmerOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Morris v. AndrosOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Gulas v. TironeOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API