Nusekabel v. Cincinnati Public School Employees Credit Union, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Painter, Presiding Judge.
In this case, the city of Cincinnati’s failed attempt to create a subway system in the 1920s haunts a present-day real-estate tangle. Inattention by later parties has created a further mess concerning a parking lot for a building that was built before the automobile’s invention. And the trial court’s well-intentioned action has woven a further and worse tangle. We must cut the knot.
I. The History
In September 1988, Edward and Carol Nusekabel, the plaintiffs-appellees, acquired title to 1009 Marshall Avenue, on which an apartment building extends the property’s entire…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Cincinnati v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 1855
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Striefel v. Charles-Keyt-Leaman PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Houck v. Board of Park CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Fitzpatrick v. PalmerOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Morris v. AndrosOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Gulas v. TironeOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.