Striefel v. Charles-Keyt-Leaman Partnership
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Joseph H. Striefel appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Mead, J.) in favor of Donna Brignull, Donald W. MacLeod III, and Martha M. Sikkema (collectively, “the MacLeods”) in Striefel’s action seeking a declaration of his rights in a strip of land. Striefel contends that: (1) the trial court applied the wrong standard of proof; and (2) the evidence was insufficient to establish the elements of adverse possession. We disagree, and affirm the judgment.
[¶ 2] The dispute in issue pertains to a portion of an approximately twenty-foot-wide strip of land in…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- French v. PearceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
- Potts v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Foot v. BaumanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Flowers v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Charlton v. Town of OxfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Eaton v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Rutland v. MullenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Dowley v. MorencySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.