Legal Opinion

Carter v. Carr

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1934No. Civ. No. 1295PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

Plaintiff: instituted this action to recover from defendants certain sums of money alleged to have been paid by them in compliance with the provisions of a written contract for the sale of cattle entered into between plaintiff and the defendant, S. G. Carr, which contract was alleged to have been rescinded by plaintiff because of certain false and fraudulent representations made to plaintiff by Carr and by Carr’s employee and agent, one Rutledge. The complaint alleged that plaintiff gave notice of rescission and offered to surrender possession of the cattle purchased and demanded return of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bergtholdt v. Porter Bros.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Crystal Pier Amusement Co. v. CannanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. House v. PierecyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Divani v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Vind v. Asamblea Apostolica De La Fe en Christo JesusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Vice v. ThackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API